An SEO Guide To Web URL Canonicalisation

canonicalisationWhat is canonicalisation in SEO?

In SEO, canonicalisation refers to web content that has more than one possible URL.

Why is it important?

In SEO, having multiple URLs for the same web content can cause problems with the search engines. It is best used in SEO to tell the search engine spiders, such as the Googlebot, about your websites’ preferred URL format.

How do canonicalisation problems occur?

Canonicalisation can be overlooked during the development stage. Problems are caused when the search engine spiders see multiple URLs pointing to the same page, as they then need to determine which URL is the most relevant to index.

What effect can this have with your websites’ SEO?

There are a few negative effects that this could have with your websites’ SEO.

  1. You could experience ‘splitting of your site’; whereby your website receives more than one search engine index, which means that the search engine is seeing and indexing two URL addresses for the same content.
  2. You could potentially become flagged as a content copier for having duplicate content.
  3. Your website backlinks and PageRank may be split between the two indexed URLs.

What is the best practice to adopt with SEO Canonicalisation?

You can use any of the following commands for the SEO canonicalisation of your website.

A) Head Tag solution

You can insert the following head tag command to canonicalise your web pages. Insert your preferred URL into the tag and then insert the tag underneath the metatags in your HTML code within the HEAD tag.

<link rel=”canonical” href=”http://www.domain.com”>

View the example below.

1

B) HTACCESS solution

I. Web Page Redirect

You can insert the following command into your HTACCESS file to redirect your web page URLs to your preferred URL.

Redirect 301 /index.html http://www.domain.com/

Click here to read more on redirects

II. Domain Permanent Redirect

You can redirect multiple URLs to your preferred domain via a domain redirect. You can do this by the following.

Option +FollowSymLinks
RewriteEngine onewritecond % {http_host} ^domain.com [nc]
rewriterule^(.*)$ http://www.domain.com

Best Practise For Canonicalisation

  1. Make sure that the internal links within your website point to exactly the same URL, rather than different URLs with the same content.
  2. If your website runs session IDs, be sure to canonicalise the web pages to your preferred URL.
  3. Make sure to use 301 redirects if you need to canonicalise a URL address or domain. Alternatively, use the canonicalisation head tag in web pages that may automatically generate session IDs on URL addresses.

Image credit: Bull3t

When it Comes to Adwords, It Pays to be Negative

thumbs-down

What am I blethering on about? Negative keywords.

So, what are negative keywords?

According to Google:

“Negative keywords are a core component of a successful keyword list. Adding a negative keyword to your ad group or campaign means that your ads won’t show for search queries containing that term. By filtering out unwanted impressions, negative keywords can help you reach the most appropriate prospects, reduce your cost-per-click (CPC), and increase your ROI.”

Still not sure? Let’s imagine that you sell iPods. Therefore, you’re bidding on terms like iPod, the various models and colours and so on. However, you don’t give them away for free. By including ‘free’ as negative match, you’re ads will not show for searches such as ‘free iPod’.

Sounds sensible, right? And yet, I see many campaigns with either no negative keywords at all, or a woefully inadequate list.

The good news is, that sometimes – you can get away with it. Google applies a relevancy algorithm to every keyword in your campaign, which it compares to the keyword entered by the searcher.

Over time, Google will recognise that certain search terms do not illicit clicks and so over time, you will automatically stop appearing for these search terms. This does take time though, and in the meantime your campaigns will suffer.

However of course, this assumes that you don’t get clicks. If you get clicks your ads will continue to show, and you’ll be wasting money. Bad times.

So, I’m guessing you’re now sold on the need to include negative keywords – but how do you go about it?

 

Adding Negatives

You can add negative keywords either at a campaign or an adgroup level. Using the new interface, simply click on the campaign you want to add negatives to, then click on the keywords tab. Scroll down to the bottom of the page and you’ll see a link for negative keywords. Here you can elect to add them either at the campaign, or ad group level.

As with the keywords you bid on you can elect to add them as negative broad, negative phrase or negative exact match:

Negative Broad – this will prevent your ads from showing if the keyword (or words) you select appear anywhere in the search query

e.g. If you negative broad match Van, your ads will not appear for any search queries which include the word van

Negative Phrase – this will prevent your ads from showing if the phrase you selected appears in the order you’ve entered it anywhere in the search query

e.g. If you negative phrase match van insurance, your ads will not appear for the search query ‘van insurance’ but will appear for search queries such as ‘insurance for van’

Negative Exact – this will only prevent your ads from showing for the precise phrase which you have selected.

e.g. If you negative exact match van insurance your ads will not appear for the search query ‘van insurance’ but will appear for search queries such as ‘insurance for van’ and ‘van insurance quote’

 

How to find negative keywords to add to your campaigns

Most you’ll be able to figure out all by yourself :)

The key question to ask yourself is what don’t you do? Think about products and services which are related to your sector, but you do not offer.

Also think about how you sell – for example if you don’t give things away free – you’ll need to add ‘free’ as negative match. Likewise if you don’t lease or hire you’ll need to add those. Conversely if you only lease or hire you’ll need to include ‘buy’ as negative match.

Other negatives worth considering include:

Job Seekers – consider including: career, careers, jobs, job, etc

Courses/Qualifications – classes, courses, qualifications etc

DIY – DIY, how to, etc

Repair – repair, repairs etc

Second Hand / Antiques - second hand, antique, antiques, etc

Software – software, freeware, downloads

 

Google’s keyword tool is also a great source, as it demonstrates the sort of searches which Google deem relevant to your selected keywords. Simply copy a representative chunk of your keywords into the keyword suggestion tool. Then go through the list of suggestions generated by the tool and include any irrelevant ones as negatives.

 

Likewise the search query report will tell you which search queries have elicited clicks. To run the report:

  1. Click on the ‘reporting tab and select ‘reports’.
  2. Click on create new report.
  3. Select ‘Search Query Report’
  4. Select adgroup from the drop down menu (for some reason this defaults to ad, but in my view the report’s much easier to use if it’s filtered by adgroup)
  5. Select an appropriate length of time e.g. one month.
  6. Hit ‘create report’ and Bob’s your Mother’s Brother

Most of the search queries will be relevant (hopefully!), but add any irrelevant ones as negatives.

 

I hope you’ve found this useful – if you’ve any tips of your own you’d care to share, please do so in the comments.

 

Image credit Fuyoh

This Week In Search 7/8/09

Happy, er Monday! Please find to follow my belated round up of the top articles in search last week.

sugar-soldiers

SEO

Danny Dover has written an excellent guide to moving domains - definitely bookmark -worthy!

Social Media

Over at Search Engine Land Ciaran Norris highlights the spate of brands using social media as a band aid and urges companies to stop saying sorry and start getting really social.

 

PPC

Always wondered why Adwords conversion tracking doesn’t match up to the conversion tracking in Analytics? Matthew from Receptional does a top notch job of explaining the discrepancy.

George Michie talks about his research collaborationwith direct mail practitioners in an attempt to ascertain whether or not key learnings from the traditional catalogue shopping industry can be similarly applied to PPC campaigns.

Aaaannnnd Finally, Friday’s Funny

Got some time to kill?  Waste a few minutes clicking on this Pringles Banner ad (don’t worry, you’ll not be taken anywhere dodgy) – it’s a really rather mavellous way to waste some time – hat tip to Ciaran for this one.

 

Image credit Yogma.

And the answer is…

Thank you to all who submitted your answers on my previous post Which One Would You Choose; where I asked visitors to select from a choice of four site snapshots, which site they would complete a ESTA form on.

The lines are now closed and the votes are in…  Let’s see how the people chose…

Results from questionaire

Most people chose A.

The official site to complete an ESTA on is D. If you completed a form on D it would of been free and would be guaranteed to be processed. If you completed a form on any of the other three you would of had to pay approximately £30 – £40. These 3 sites are typical of many that are charging people to complete ESTA forms.

 

Official Sites Versus Unofficial Sites

The results here reflect reports that more people are paying to complete ESTA forms from unofficial sites. It’s important to note that the people who complete the forms and end up paying for them are not stupid. They are victims of well worked campaigns combined with efficient design.  Here are some design related reasons I believe people are paying to complete forms on the unofficial sites rather than for free on the official site:

 

Colour Schemes/Look & Feel

A lot of the unofficial sites appear have utilised ‘American’ colour schemes (reds and blues), flags and American imagery:

esta-us

estauk.com

travel-authroziation.org

Whereas the official site is prodominently green which most would not immediately associate with America:

official

It’s possible that some people are electing to use the ‘unofficial’ sites as the appear to have more synergy with the USA, and therefore people think that they look more official.

 

Calls to Action & Usability
There are clear calls to action on the unofficial sites. Well placed and noticeable buttons labelled:  Click Here, Instant Download, ESTA Form or Continue, help make it easy for the site visitor to complete what they want to do, in this case fill out an ESTA form.

buttons-links

The buttons and links are placed in a combination of places some at the top of the web page, some at the bottom but they all have at least one call to action that appears on screen as soon as the page appears on screen.

However, the official site has no clear call to action; you have to work really hard to discover what you have to do next.  In fact (as illustrated below) you have to scroll about 1600 pixels down the page (i.e. well below the fold – if you consider that the average screen displays 1020 pixels) before you even see the apply button! Ordinarily we’d recommend that calls to action appear both above and below the fold.

 

embassy-call

It’s possible then that some come to the official site, but lose confidence as it’s not immediately apparent what they need to do.

 

Assurance and Confidence
Here, both the official and unofficial sites do pretty well. Most of the sites in this example use checklists or step by step examples . Each help to give an impression of transparency and encourage confidence in the site.

Example1:

travel-authroziation-org-confidence

Example 2:

esta-us-confidence

 

Conclusion

One of the most important things to learn from this example is the importance of call to action and usability. Although  27% chose the official site based on a snapshot. Had the test been based on visiting the sites it may have been even less, seeing as visitors have to scroll down nearly twice the length of the screen to even find the apply button.

Every site needs a call to action whether it is to fill out a form, generate a phone call or submit a vote. The clearer the call to action is, the better the site will convert.

Similarly, consideration needs to be given to site look and feel. Use of colour and imagery, and theming to meet visitor’s expectations of how a site should look are key.

 

Suggestions for the Official Site

If I was tasked with redesigning the form on the official site, I’d look specifically at the following areas:

  1. The essential difference between the official site and the others is that it is free to complete the ESTA form. Yet this is not mentioned on the the official site . The first thing I would do is alert the visitor that the form is free to complete on this site.
  2. I would also address the call to action. I would place an apply now button close to the top of the page with enough white space around it for it to stand out.
  3. I would also look to address the design / colour scheme in order to reflect an outsider’s perception of “America”

Cookie Use

Gravytrain uses cookies, small text files which are downloaded to your computer's hard drive when you visit most websites.

Cookies are harmless files which can help improve the experience. Cookies allow websites to respond to you as an individual. The website can tailor its operations to your needs, likes and dislikes by gathering and remembering information about your preferences.

By using our website, you agree to allow us to use cookies to improve your experiece with us.

Cookie Policy
Read more