Race, Kev, Race! 2010 Mazda MX5 Championship – Rounds 4, 5, 6 & 7

If you’ve been keeping up-to-date with our Director Kevin Taylor’s Schumacher-esque return to racing, you’ll be well aware of the thrills and spills of his first day back in the racing seat.

To recap, the Mazda MX5 Championship, like F1, is a series of races where points are scored.  Kevin is racing in a Mazda for Jim Edwards’ E3 Sport, who Gravytrain proudly sponsor.  The other members of the team are Jade & Chloe Edwards, both of whom have raced in the Ginetta Junior championship with many other racing accolades between them.

Last time at Brands Hatch Kevin finished off 24th the first couple of races and unfortunately crashed out in spectacular style in his third outing.

Drawing a line under that setback, Kevin raced in rounds 4 & 5 at Snetterton on the 23rd & 24th of April. Wanting to be able to look his employees in the eye on Monday morning, he accomplished a very impressive 15th and a respectable 29th.

Kevin Taylor Mazda MX5

In the end Jade accomplished a top ten finish in heavy rain, while the rest of team managed a decent outing as well.

Rounds 6 & 8 took place at Oulton Park on the 15th May where Kevin, Jade and Chloe represented E3 Sport proudly. Once upon a time 14 years ago, our boss Kevin podiumed there in a front wheel drive Renault 5TS. This time around though he bagged decent 17th and 28th places.

The highlight of the day for E3 Sport was the Top 12 finish for Jade, beating her Granddad who had qualified in 8th place racing for Rob Boston Racing.

We now head into the next two rounds taking place on the 5th and 6th of June at Cadwell Park. Next time as Kevin sits in his Mazda emblazoned in the Gravytrain logo, he is representing everyone here at the office. We look to him to set us an example on how to achieve. Hopefully he will not let us down.

So, no pressure.  Race, Kev, Race!

HTML5 – The Future of the Internet?

If you managed to catch my recent blog post on what place Flash has in web design today, you will know about Apple  going against using Flash in their iPad and  iPhone devices. This is because many Apple computer users are all too used to Flash crashing on their machines, so much so that Apple have looked to alternative ways to deliver video and other dynamic content. HTML5 might be the answer to Apple’s problem…

HTML5

HTML5 is currently being developed by the Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group (WHATWG) for the W3C who recommend the standards for web browsers.   Although the latest versions of Firefox, Safari, Chrome and Opera have started supporting certain elements of the BETA HTML5, it won’t be until 2012 when they have something ready for the W3C to consider for candidate recommendation.

It is also predicted that we will have to wait until 2022 at the earliest until everyone will be using HTML5 as standard. 2022 is long way off! China will have taken over the world by then, Pandas will be extinct,  Venice will be flooded and I will be the ripe old age of 35! Plenty of time for Flash to get it’s act together.

So, how will HTML5 improve the way we view websites? The primary reason for it’s creation is to remove the need for people to constantly have to update plugins like  Adobe Flash, Microsoft Silverlight, and Sun JavaFX. The new <video> and <audio> tags will allow content to be inserted without all the extra laborious code that is required in XHTML to pull outside sources.

This will mean that sites should load faster which will benefit users, and of course is likely to be looked on favourably by search engines.

The aim of HTML5 is to standardise how websites are rendered across all browsers – at the moment without careful testing sites often look vastly different even in the popular browsers.

As a web designer, I am delighted to know that HTML5 is on it’s way – even if it may be quite some time before it’s launched.  I certainly won’t miss the trials and tribulations of getting websites to work in all browsers!

Image credit: Justin Insomnia

Is that Website Selling Links? Here’s a Few Ways to Tell..

When we’re evaluating potential link partners for our clients, one of the key things we look at is whether they are in the business of selling links. The last thing we want to do is expend our resources targeting websites that might pass little or  no value, because they are obviously selling links without using nofollow. The chances are, if you are confidently able to determine that a given website is selling links just by looking at it, the search engines will also be able tell and thereby nullify any value passed.

Bear in mind that Google doesn’t need to be too concerned about making mistakes when doing such a classification – as long as they penalise link sellers (by stopping them from passing value) they don’t risk excluding sites unfairly.

make sure your links don't look like this

Here’s just a few of the many signals we look at to determine if a site is selling links:

Look out for Blocks of Links

Some websites are less savvy about Google’s terms than others. Whilst it may be against Google T&C’s to sell links (unless using nofollow) many webmasters are unaware of this and don’t go to a great deal of effort to disguise the fact that they are selling links. They will therefore mark up the section ‘Sponsored Links’ or something equally blatant. This is extremely easy for either a manual reviewer or an algorithm to spot. If you are familiar with HTML, you can also check the source of any link blocks to look for clues in the markup if you see something like ‘div id=’ads”, then you have another clue ;)

Another obvious signal is where you find a block of links, often in a dubious place on the website (e.g the footer), that all link to a set of seemingly unconnected but commercial websites. A key thing to differentiate here is a ‘Blogroll’ from a block of ad-links – a Blogroll will usually link out to useful resources which tend to be a mix of other blogs, commercial and non commercial links – a block of ads will link purely to commercial websites.

Check the Anchor Text

Another obvious signal is in the anchor text of links – i.e. the text you see on the screen for the link. If all the links say things like ‘Credit Cards’, ‘Car Insurance’ etc, then there’s a str0ng possibility somebody paid for the website to link with favourable text – this is especially likely to be the case if:

a) the site being linked to isn’t called ‘Credit Cards’ (i.e. doesn’t have the url www.creditcards.com)

b) the site being linked is obviously targeting ‘Credit Cards’ as a keyword

Who are they linking to?

Possibly my favourite test of all when looking at a website’s outbound links is to see exactly who they are linking to. Generally, you can identify the major link buyers in any industry – the types that have chunky five figure link building budgets that buy rich links from anywhere and everywhere. If the website you are looking at links out to these (especially with rich anchor text in a sidebar) then it’s almost certain they are in the business of selling links – Google knows who the major offenders of link buying are, and therefore by association has a good idea of who the sellers are too – don’t get yourself involved with this crowd because you’ll probably be wasting your time/money… or worse, you may see a your site penalised.

Who owns the website?

Although this might lead to an occasional false negative, the owner of the website can give you a good clue as to their intentions. There are two interesting things to look out for here:

1) Is the website owned by a publishing company? If so, you can almost certainly buy a link. Generally speaking links tends to be nofollowed and go through some sort of tracking url. However, some publishing companies have wised up to the potential income from followed links…

2) Is there a disconnect between the websites owner details and their audience? For example is the website targeting a UK audience but owned by an individual outside the UK who also owns 572 other domains. Why should this concern you? Because there are literally thousands if not millions of websites created every day,  purely to sell links to other countries. Although there will sometimes be a perfectly legitimate reason why the domain owner is overseas,  it’s just another indicator that the website was created with the intention of selling links which can be balanced against other signs and signals.

Use your common sense!

It might be difficult to see every link on a page, but given you can pretty much ignore internal links for this purpose, scan your mouse over all the main link blocks and pay attention to the external links – a simple sense check can often tell you whether or not the link deserves to be there. Put yourself in the users shoes – if there’s no logical reason you’d want to click on the outbound links, then chances are, the site’s selling links.

Image credit Tim Parkinson

Online Marketing for Profit – Presentation

Well today’s the day!

If you can’t make it along to our Online Marketing for Profit knowledge session fear not – you can still view the presentation right here :)

Online Marketing For Profit

View more presentations from Hannah Smith.

New PPC Whitepaper

Are you confused about Pay Per Click Advertising?

Don’t feel bad, whilst the overriding concept is simple, in practise PPC Campaigns can quickly become complicated.

This free whitepaper explains all the key concepts you need to understand, and provides an easy to follow guide to create your own PPC campaign.

Click here to download our Introduction to PPC whitepaper.

If you’ve any further queries or questions feel free to post them here, likewise if you’ve any feedback on this whitepaper, or suggestions for other whitepapers you’d like to see in the future we’d love to hear about them!