SEO Agencies & Scalability – Why Bigger Often isn’t Better
Posted in SEO on July 30th, 2010 by MatthewOne of the toughest challenges for a digital agency, after building an SEO proposition, is how to scale it. Being a human capital driven service, many good SEO agencies are borne out of a small pool of talent that embrace the medium and have the right skill set to capitalise on it. On the face of it then, it sounds rather straightforward to scale – just get more good people in to service the new clients as they flow in.

Are you trying to get too big?
The reason then, why this often doesn’t work as planned, would also appear to be quite logical – many new recruits to such businesses simply don’t reach the same standard as the founders, perhaps because the best people are already part of a successful company already, or they aren’t able to grasp the knowledge needed. There is some truth in this – SEO, being a relatively new industry, isn’t easy to recruit for – people with many years experience are in short supply while there are few educational alternatives for those without it.
Although good recruitment can help to overcome the problem, it usually needs to be backed up by a pretty good training proposition for new staff. Training SEOs can be harder than it sounds too – good SEO doesn’t just require a large amount of knowledge around a variety of subjects, but it also requires that the knowledge is up to date. As such most agency SEO training is done in-house, further draining away the time the talented staff have to spend on clients.
But recruiting and training staff is only half of the problem, and arguably the most solvable. A bigger problem could be successfully achieving scalability itself. In an effort to achieve scalability, economies of scale must be achieved to compensate for the almost inevitable dilution in talent. The few agencies that have grown beyond a few dozen staff have tried a variety of things to achieve this, from content networks & their own indexes of the web, to heavy automation of regular tasks like reporting. While the effectiveness of these particular strategies can of course vary, they all tend to have the side effect of making life for their new staff easier. And herein lies that deeper problem.
These SEO agencies that were good enough to achieve a good reputation and rapidly grow their client base typically didn’t have these luxuries when they started out – more likely, they probably had to make do with small budgets, a shortage of time, and basic resources. Such constraints, as with many creative industries provide an environment perfect for innovation. With severe constraints, it’s not just desirable to innovate – it’s essential. Without the need to innovate, it’s even more challenging to prevent a great proposition becoming stale and mediocre.
Despite this, I have no doubt that there are many large and growing SEO agencies that provide excellent service to their clients, but I’m also equally convinced that smaller agencies have an often overlooked advantage over their larger peers – the creativity and innovative capacity of their staff can be a bigger asset than any automated system or content network.













