<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Gravytrain Blog - SEO, PPC, Web Design, Social Media &#38; Marketing &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/tag/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>News &#38; views on SEO, PPC, Web Design &#38; Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:29:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Client at Gravytrain</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/12/new-client-at-gravytrain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/12/new-client-at-gravytrain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=2506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are happy to announce that First Insurance has joined Gravytrain this December. 
First Insurance not only offers a wide range of great value motor, home and commercial insurance products to their customers, but also offer amazing discounts off car insurance for students -the better their grades, the better discounts they’ll receive! 
We will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/First-student.jpg"><img src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/First-student.jpg" alt="" title="First student" width="278" height="85" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2507" /></a>We are happy to announce that First Insurance has joined <strong><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/">Gravytrain</a></strong> this December. </p>
<p>First Insurance not only offers a wide range of great value motor, home and commercial insurance products to their customers, but also offer amazing discounts off car insurance for students -the better their grades, the better discounts they’ll receive! </p>
<p>We will be running their social media campaign to spread the word about First Insurance and the incredible discounts they offer to students with good grades. The campaign aims to bring a huge boost their presence online, and drive their core audience to their new website.</p>
<p>We are always ecstatic about having new clients joining us at Gravytrain. If you want to find out more about any of our SEO, PPC, <strong><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/">Social Media</a></strong> packages or Web Design and Development services, please contact our Business Development Executive, Alex Moran, on 0203 582 6870. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/12/new-client-at-gravytrain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google PageRank Panic</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/10/google-pagerank-panic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/10/google-pagerank-panic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 13:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEOQuake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=2371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two days ago some people may have noticed that their PageRank toolbar started to only bring back values of N/A or 0. It got tongues wagging about the web and people were wondering whether it was a glitch, a new update, or if Google had disabled PageRank scores altogether.
After reading SEOQuake’s tweets this morning, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/panic.jpg"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-2378" title="panic" src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/panic-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Two days ago some people may have noticed that their PageRank toolbar started to only bring back values of N/A or 0. It got tongues wagging about the web and people were wondering whether it was a glitch, a new update, or if Google had disabled PageRank scores altogether.</p>
<p>After reading SEOQuake’s tweets this morning, it turns out that Google has simply moved the tool bar query URL.</p>
<p>To fix the PageRank on your SEOQuake tool bar, go to your preferences, on your parameters tab, select ‘Google pagerank’, edit and change the word ‘search’ to ‘tbr’.</p>
<p><strong>Before</strong> -</p>
<p>[NAME]=Google pagerank<br />
[TITLE]=PR<br />
[URL_R]=http://toolbarqueries.google.com/<strong>search</strong>?client=navclient-auto&amp;hl=en&amp;ch={gchecksum}&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;features=Rank&amp;q=info:{url|encode}<br />
[REGEXP]=Rank_.*?:.*?:(\d+)</p>
<p><strong>After</strong> -</p>
<p>[NAME]=Google pagerank<br />
[TITLE]=PR<br />
[URL_R]=http://toolbarqueries.google.com/<strong>tbr</strong>?client=navclient-auto&amp;hl=en&amp;ch={gchecksum}&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8&amp;features=Rank&amp;q=info:{url|encode}<br />
[REGEXP]=Rank_.*?:.*?:(\d+)</p>
<p>Then select ok, clear your cache and restart your browser.</p>
<p>PageRank is a measure of the volume and quality of links pointing towards your site, but it shouldn’t be used as the only comparison to how your website is performing. Other factors include the relevancy of the domain, page and domain authority and also the age of the website. We always hear of people who say “<strong><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/">SEO</a></strong>’s should ignore PageRank”, but it’s hard for us to ignore a domain if it has a score of 8, for example!</p>
<p>Link building is a main technique used by many SEOs which some people believe may eventually be killed off by Google and its future algorithms, but there’s no need to panic&#8230; not just yet anyway&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/PageRank.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2372" title="PageRank" src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/PageRank.jpg" alt="" width="455" height="229" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/10/google-pagerank-panic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matthew Oxley talks SEO Benefits for Just Landlords</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/09/matthew-oxley-talks-seo-benefits-for-just-landlords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/09/matthew-oxley-talks-seo-benefits-for-just-landlords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Oxley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Media Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nmk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search engine optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=2318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Matthew Oxley, Gravytrain’s Head of Search, talked to New Media Knowledge about how one of our clients, Just Landlords, a specialist insurance company, benefits from an excellent search engine optimisation (SEO) campaign.
Before embarking on an SEO campaign, Just Landlords received just 108 visits and 74 conversions each month. However, one year later traffic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/nmk.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2319" title="nmk" src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/nmk.jpg" alt="" width="229" height="98" /></a>Last week, Matthew Oxley, Gravytrain’s Head of Search, talked to New Media Knowledge about how one of our clients, Just Landlords, a specialist insurance company, benefits from an excellent <strong><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/">search engine optimisation</a></strong> (SEO) campaign.</p>
<p>Before embarking on an SEO campaign, Just Landlords received just 108 visits and 74 conversions each month. However, one year later traffic has increased by more than 1,500 visits and attained 950 more conversions.</p>
<p>The article focuses on a case study around how Just Landlords achieved these figures using SEO to increase their visibility in Google for their main product, landlord insurance. Therefore, the main search terms were focused around “Landlord Insurance” and “Landlords Insurance”.</p>
<p>The case study describes the two main challenges with the campaign, the first being that Just Landlords website was relatively new and the second being that the website had been penalised due to their previous SEO activity being too aggressive. The article explains how Gravytrain overcame these challenges and also includes more information about our search strategy which includes link building, content and social media.</p>
<p>After 18 months of SEO work by Gravytrain, Just Landlords receives more than 2,400 visits per month.</p>
<p>Matthew concluded that, “The Just Landlords Case study demonstrates clearly that while SEO can take time to be successful, the eventual cost effectiveness often significantly outperforms other channels”.</p>
<p>You can read the full article on <strong><a href="http://www.nmk.co.uk/article/2011/9/17/just-landlords-website-reaps-benefits-of-seo-campaign">New Media Knowledge</a></strong>’s website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/09/matthew-oxley-talks-seo-benefits-for-just-landlords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have we already forgotten about Google+?</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/09/have-we-already-forgotten-about-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/09/have-we-already-forgotten-about-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Read</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=2306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like most people in SEO, I spend a fair amount of time reading industry blogs, to see what people are currently talking about in the world of online marketing and looking out for the next big thing in SEO, such as Google+.
A couple of months ago you couldn’t move for posts about Google+, with everyone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google+.jpg"><img src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Google+.jpg" alt="" title="Google+" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2307" /></a>Like most people in SEO, I spend a fair amount of time reading industry blogs, to see what people are currently talking about in the world of online marketing and looking out for the next big thing in SEO, such as Google+.</p>
<p>A couple of months ago you couldn’t move for posts about Google+, with everyone talking about its rivalry with Facebook, its sudden influx of 20 million users and hundreds of debates about how it was going to completely change the game! But now when I look around SEOMoz, Econsultancy, Search Engine Land and the rest I see barely a few mentions of this ‘revolutionary’ new social network.</p>
<p>To be fair, I am no better than the rest, when Google+ first came out I was straight on it and published 2 or 3 posts about how it could topple Facebook, change the way we connect online and add a huge new element to <strong><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/search-engine-optimisation.php">SEO</a></strong>, but now I am paying about as much attention to it as I am to AOL.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is, so far we have seen little to no impact on SEO by Google+, and although it has 20 million+ users I haven’t seen a fresh update from any of my circles in weeks! Meanwhile, Facebook continues to roll out new features, such as the subscribe button, and both Facebook and Twitter are still much better places to interact with friends, fans and customers.</p>
<p><strong>So where do we go from here?</strong></p>
<p>A couple of months ago everyone was discussing how Google was becoming much more social and how we need to adapt to that and move away from traditional SEO tactics. However, in the last month there has been very little impact from Google+ and Google have not renewed their deal with Twitter, effectively losing some of their social element, rather than increasing it.</p>
<p>So should we just forget about Google+ and social networks altogether? Well no, social is obviously still very important for online marketing, with Twitter and Facebook being excellent mediums for creating brand awareness, customer interaction and content distribution, but I do think it is fair to say that the initial hype over Google+ was a bit much and that, although a move into social is good, abandoning traditional SEO tactics in favour of a social only approach might be a bit too presumptuous. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/09/have-we-already-forgotten-about-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google launches new social networking project Google+</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/07/google-launches-new-social-networking-project-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/07/google-launches-new-social-networking-project-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=2201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week, Google threw itself into the big world of social networking. They have launched a new project called Google+ which aims to make Google more social. It is a communications tool designed to complement and reflect all of our offline relationships. At the moment, Google+ is still in a limited field test and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Google+-opening-screen.jpg"><img src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Google+-opening-screen-300x132.jpg" alt="" title="Google+ opening screen" width="300" height="132" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2203" /></a>Last week, Google threw itself into the big world of social networking. They have launched a new project called Google+ which aims to make Google more social. It is a communications tool designed to complement and reflect all of our offline relationships. At the moment, Google+ is still in a limited field test and the service is currently restricted, unless you were one of the lucky people who got an invitation.</p>
<p>In the past, Google used Twitter for faster indexation of content, to power real time results and also for use in their ranking algorithm. It has been reported that Google removed real time results from Twitter and other websites such as their News and Facebook. However, Google plans to reinstate real time results using Google+.</p>
<p>Even though Google+ is different from <a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/04/google-goes-social-with-1/"><b>Google+1</b></a>, with each having their own unique functions &#8211; they do connect with each other. Users who have a Google+ account or a normal Google account will be able to click on the Google+1 button, which will essentially allow users to vote for their search results and see which websites other connections or friends have “+1ed”. Therefore, the result’s rankings will not only affect you, but also people that you are connected with through Google. </p>
<h3>Some of Google+’s features</h3>
<p>The main feature of Google+ is the Circles feature, which is similar to Facebook and Twitter Lists. Circles allow you to allocate contacts to Circles e.g. Family, Friends, Snowboarding Group, Acquaintances and whoever else you want in the Circle. You can then publish content to specific Circles or specific individuals, because as Google states, “not all relationships are created equal”. </p>
<p>At the moment, there seems to be more control over privacy on Google+ compared to Facebook. You can share photos with your family in one post, and then publish something publicly in the next post.  <a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Google+-account.jpg"><img src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Google+-account-300x126.jpg" alt="" title="Google+ account" width="300" height="126" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2205" /></a></p>
<p>Hangout is another feature of Google+. It’s a group video chat feature where you can invite members of a certain group by sending them a notification. An additional feature of the new social networking site is Huddle, which is a mobile group chat service which could also become available from your mobile phone in the near future.</p>
<p>Sparks is an online sharing engine where you can create a topic of interest and share links with group friends who also have the same interests. E.g. you could share results of Snowboarding in France with your “powder chasing” friends. </p>
<h3>Why Google+?</h3>
<p>Some people may wonder why Google has bothered launching Google+. The reasons are because nowadays, search is about real-time information, people and the relevance of information to them, not just about pages. </p>
<p>Google has been an advocate for real time and social media for a while now, with Google Buzz, Google Places, Google Wave and not to mention the list of its acquisitions of social sites e.g. YouTube and Blogger.com. </p>
<p>The senior vice president who oversees Google’s social product, Vic Gundotra, said “It’s ‘project&#8217; rather than a product because it’s an ongoing set of products and ‘Plus’ because it takes products from Google and makes them better”. </p>
<p>Google doesn’t see itself as a competitor to Facebook or Twitter, as they say that the way people connect online is limited &#8211; it’s just a new way to connect online with the people that matter to you.</p>
<h3>What’s next?</h3>
<p>For now, businesses and organisations have been warned to stay away from Google+. Christian Oestlien, advertising lead on the team behind Google+ explains that the social media site was designed for individuals in mind, “We’re working on building a optimised business experience for Google+ which will hopefully be rolled out later on this year. It will include the ability to connect to other parts of Google such as AdWords and other rich analytics”. However, their main focus at the moment is optimising the consumer experience for Google+. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Google+.jpg"><img src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Google+-300x199.jpg" alt="" title="Google+" width="300" height="199" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2210" /></a>In terms of <b><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/">SEO</a></b>, social media won’t replace traditional SEO however, it will indeed help it. SEO practices including link building, content creation, keyword research and targeting will be the foundation for ranking success. Even though social media is gaining more importance and interest, using a combination of both technical SEO techniques and social media are the best steps towards success.</p>
<p>Sadly, we weren’t lucky enough to get our hands on an invite the first time round, but we are looking forward to when we are able to get onboard with the project. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/07/google-launches-new-social-networking-project-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Actually Uses Twitter Anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/05/who-actually-uses-twitter-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/05/who-actually-uses-twitter-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 14:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Read</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEOMoz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=2044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Next time you are with a group of your friends ask them “what do you think of Twitter?” and I bet you will get the same response I get from every Jane Doe and Jo Blogs I ask “erm&#8230;I have a Twitter account but I don’t really see the point of it&#8230;I prefer Facebook”.
Yes, despite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Twitter.jpg"><img src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Twitter.jpg" alt="" title="Twitter" width="600" height="230" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2045" /></a></p>
<p>Next time you are with a group of your friends ask them “what do you think of Twitter?” and I bet you will get the same response I get from every Jane Doe and Jo Blogs I ask “erm&#8230;I have a Twitter account but I don’t really see the point of it&#8230;I prefer Facebook”.</p>
<p>Yes, despite having more than 200 million users, Twitter still seems to have this odd reputation as being not as good or important as Facebook. What’s more, it isn’t just individual users who appear to have this thinking, but also many small to medium sized businesses as well.</p>
<p>Every day I seem to come across more and more small to medium sized businesses with well optimized sites, beautiful blogs and fantastic Facebook pages but have Twitter accounts with no Tweets, no followers and not even a picture!</p>
<p>For a few years now many small, medium and large businesses all around the world have been realising the importance of Social Media for online brand awareness, website traffic and Google Rankings. Yet despite these businesses doing excellent things with blogs and Facebook pages, their Twitter accounts seem to have been left behind, given less attention, time and focus.  </p>
<p><strong>Why Twitter is Becoming More Important</strong><br />
In recent months we have seen Google release 2 new features to try and make search results more personal, refined and more social. Blocked and +1 have both been developed to help make Google more of a social network, focusing more on individual user’s preferences, connections and tastes, to help deliver the most relevant results for each individual user.</p>
<p>With this, all signs are pointing to the idea that Google rankings are being more and more influenced by user generated content such as comments on blogs, Facebook Likes and of course Tweets! With Google apparently in the process of trying to acquire Twitter and already having access to their vast amount of user data, they appear to be attributing more and more importance to businesses Twitter accounts when it comes to rankings.</p>
<p><strong>Links vs Tweets</strong><br />
It may seem farfetched to attribute higher Google rankings to the number of Twitter followers you have, but as we can see from the latest <strong><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/early-ranking-factors-data-an-april-linkscape-update">SEOMoz Ranking Factors</a></strong> data, as well as other research, Twitter seems to be having as big an impact as blogs, keyword focused content and even links.</p>
<p>Of course, this is not to say that traditional SEO methods, such as onsite optimisation, keyword focused content and link building, are no longer important, and a strong <strong><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/">SEO</a></strong> campaign should feature all of these elements. However, it is clear that we need to keep pushing Social Media and start giving Twitter the attention it deserves. </p>
<p>We already know how important Social Media can be for brand awareness, online promotion and networking, but now it also appears to be having an even greater impact , affecting Google’s search results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/05/who-actually-uses-twitter-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blocked! Google attempts to make search more personal</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/03/blocked-google-attempts-to-make-search-more-personal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/03/blocked-google-attempts-to-make-search-more-personal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Read</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Blocked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=1861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the dawn of Google one of the main aims has been to make search results more personalised and relevant to the individual user. Over the years Google have tried to achieve this aim with additions such as Stars in Search results, Search Wiki and of course the addition of location settings and Google Places.
However, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Google1.png"><img src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Google1-300x108.png" alt="" title="Google" width="300" height="108" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1864" /></a>Since the dawn of Google one of the main aims has been to make search results more personalised and relevant to the individual user. Over the years Google have tried to achieve this aim with additions such as Stars in Search results, Search Wiki and of course the addition of location settings and <strong><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/02/the-rise-of-google-places/">Google Places</a></strong>.</p>
<p>However, even with all these additions, Google is still trying to make search results more personalised and so this week has introduced a new blocking feature on Google.com which will allow individual users to block whole domains from their search results.</p>
<p>Basically the new process will work like this; when you search for something, i.e. “how to fix a TV”, your usual search results will come up and there will be nothing different about the results. However, if you click on a site and then go straight back to your search results (because the site wasn’t what you were after) you will then see an option to block the website from your search results, located next to the “Cached” button.</p>
<p>So say there is a particular How To or Content site you always see in your results but don’t like, you will be able to block the domain and stop any of their pages from ever appearing in any of your search results.</p>
<p>This new option is linked to Google Accounts and so to keep the block permanent you will need to do it whilst logged in. And don’t worry if you change your mind later there will be an option to undo all of your blocks.</p>
<h3>Ramifications for SEO</h3>
<p>On the service this is simply a new tool to make search more personalised for individual users and in that sense has very little impact for <strong><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/search-engine-optimisation.php">SEO</a></strong>. However, although they are not doing so yet, Google have mentioned the possibility of using this new feature as a signal in ranking, stating that “we’ll look at the data and see whether it would be useful as we continue to evaluate and improve our search results in the future”.</p>
<p>In a very simple sense, the way this would work is, the more times a site has been blocked the more damaging to its rankings. So if a sites blocked by 100,000 people it will likely move lower than a similar site blocked by just 100 people. </p>
<p>If this idea were to be used as a new ranking criteria in Google there could be huge ramifications for SEO. With the addition of a block button, businesses could target rivals with negative SEO, setting up hundreds of fake Google accounts through Mechanical Turk and blocking a competitor site over and over.</p>
<p>So how can Google prevent this negative SEO? Well if they were to use this as criteria for rankings they would surely have to use just a select group of user’s activity to determine rankings. Basically, they would have to just look at users who have been around for a long time, have a well built up profile and are blocking domains very selectively.</p>
<h3>Is this likely to affect rankings?</h3>
<p>In theory this sounds like a great new way for Google to evaluate rankings, but with the huge possibility for negative SEO and the labour in finding a very select group of users doing it properly, it seems unlikely that it will come into practice anytime soon as the logistics are just too large.</p>
<p>However, although we may not see this impacting SEO anytime soon, the new blocking option is another step towards the ultimate personalised results that Google so desire! The new feature has gone live on Google.com this week and will be making its way to Google.co.uk very soon, so look out for it and start thinking of some sites you are sick of seeing in your results.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/03/blocked-google-attempts-to-make-search-more-personal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rise Of Google Places</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/02/the-rise-of-google-places/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/02/the-rise-of-google-places/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Angelina</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Places]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Places SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=1793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the introduction of Google places, localised searches are becoming a topic of popular discussion within SEO; this is a new way to be found on Google. The online map directory has very quickly become a sort of yellow pages’ competition; search engines are already three times as popular! This has opened a new frontier [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the introduction of Google places, localised searches are becoming a topic of popular discussion within SEO; this is a new way to be found on Google. The online map directory has very quickly become a sort of yellow pages’ competition; search engines are already three times as popular! This has opened a new frontier for local businesses to market themselves. Despite this, it appears Google places is often overlooked by both businesses and SEOs.</p>
<p>Google places has many attractive features that can be optimised to meet your requirements, and improve your online presence. You will need to optimise your listings and make them a part of your SEO campaign for more effective results.</p>
<h3>Attractive and beneficial key features</h3>
<ol>
<li>Google places is now incorporated in the main search engine this shows the importance Google will continue to place on local searches. We’ve noticed <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=locksmiths+in+london">some searches</a> now have as many ‘places’ results as regular organic results, Making this an ideal way to promote online presence, particularly for small to medium sized businesses.</li>
<li>Claiming your business is the first step. Using city and business keywords within the page title and listing is great for optimisation, resulting in a positive page rank. Your business may already rank so claiming it will only strengthen your positions especially after optimisation. This can really help close out your competitors as well as improve your overall clickthrough share.</li>
<li>Google places also comes with a range of tools to help market your business better. Tags are yellow markers that allow you to promote individual aspects of your business, for example, special offers.</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/photo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1799" title="photo" src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/photo-200x300.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="300" /></a>The image shows how Google places appears after you have entered a search query.</p>
<p>Mobile phone web users, when downloading Google maps app, searching for any place of interest will automatically bring up local results. This is something I personally rely on especially when visiting a new area in the city. With so many benefits and key features it is hard to believe you have anything lose!<br clear="ALL"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/02/the-rise-of-google-places/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>will 2011 be the year SEO actually changes?</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/01/will-2011-be-the-year-seo-actually-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/01/will-2011-be-the-year-seo-actually-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=1681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2010 seemed like one the busiest years in search that I can remember. I say seemed , mainly,  because it wasn’t. Don’t get me wrong, there was a fair deal of activity from both engines last year – it’s just that I don’t think much of it had anywhere near the impact so many people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2010 seemed like one the busiest years in search that I can remember. I say seemed , mainly,  because it wasn’t. Don’t get me wrong, there was a fair deal of activity from both engines last year – it’s just that I don’t think much of it had anywhere near the impact so many people thought it would.<br />
I’m talking, of course, of things like Google Instant and Instant Preview . These were pretty significant changes as far as user experience goes, and received a huge amount of attention from both the SEO community and (especially in the former case) even the mainstream media. They were the kind of changes that would make my mum say “Ooh, Google’s changed”.</p>
<p>The impacts of the many interface changes in 2010 changes in 2010 were all very modest though, as far as SEO goes (not even the eventual rollout of the infrastructure related &#8216;caffiene&#8217; update made a huge impact). What is easy to miss is how little these changes affect consumer behaviour – people still use a search engine to find websites and click on one of the top ones, just as they did a year ago. The only difference then, is that new distractions exist – given many distractions (think vertical search) already existed; the impact on traditional search has proved to absolutely minimal. There were some bigger changes to SEO – the heavy places integration in q4 of last year is bound to have a huge impact, but only if you’re competing for ‘local’ type searches.</p>
<div id="attachment_1700" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/coffee012.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1700" title="coffee01" src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/coffee012.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="333" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Despite the hype, the caffiene update didn&#39;t provide a rush of traffic for many SEO&#39;s </p></div>
<p>Nevertheless, when these changes happened, they all provoked huge debate ranging from the usual “SEO is dead”, to predictions of more specific impacts on things like click through rates. The blogs were busy, Twitter was trending, and there were doubtlessly thousands of emails received by clients and managers about how these changes would fundamentally change search and how a new strategy was needed ASAP. And yet, if we’re honest, we’re probably entering 2011 largely unchanged.</p>
<p>But rather like the boy who cried wolf, I do think there could be more changes in 2011, from Google in particular. Google could have a huge impact and has the potential to catch many off guard, as we remember all the changes which didn’t change much in 2010. With Google’s algorithm still being hugely dependent on links, despite viable alternative now existing and being used in a limited capacity , Google have the potential to make a change to what really matter to marketers and (particularly) SEO’s – the way websites are ranked.</p>
<p>If any of the below occur to a moderate degree, 2011 would create the biggest challenge to SEO’s in many years:</p>
<ul>
<li>Tweets/Likes used heavily in to determine popularity (as opposed to , as I suspect currently , regency)</li>
<li>User behaviour, such as bounces, folded into main algorithm</li>
<li>A change to the ‘reasonable surfer’ model to how links are weighted</li>
<li>A complete , or near complete disregard for Anchor text in the same way as happened with meta tags</li>
<li>Prevention of duplicate “mill” content from being indexed and passing page rank</li>
</ul>
<p>For what it’s worth, I’m expecting a least a couple of these things to happen. If they do, it’ll be the year that SEO really does change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2011/01/will-2011-be-the-year-seo-actually-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Preparing Your Natural Search Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2010/12/preparing-your-natural-search-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2010/12/preparing-your-natural-search-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Figaro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/?p=1675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year Gravytrain&#8217;s Head of Search Matthew Oxley gave a presentation at Figaro Digital&#8217;s &#8220;Paid &#38; Natural Search&#8221; seminar. Matthew was discussing how best to prepare your natural search strategy a topic which many SEO companies may overlook. The difference between a good or bad strategy in natural search can be millions in extra [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1677" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://www.figarodigital.co.uk/Video.aspx?v=6542937a-533a-4913-b891-56aefa735c2c"><img class="size-full wp-image-1677" title="Preparing Your Natural Search" src="http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Untitled-11.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="417" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Matthew Oxley Presenting @ Figaro</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">Earlier this year Gravytrain&#8217;s Head of Search Matthew Oxley gave a presentation at Figaro Digital&#8217;s &#8220;Paid &amp; Natural Search&#8221; seminar. Matthew was discussing how best to prepare your natural search strategy a topic which many SEO companies may overlook. The difference between a good or bad strategy in natural search can be millions in extra revenue, or being banned from the Google index entirely. With this in mind, it’s more important than ever to have a clear SEO strategy.</p>
<p>This thought provoking session takes a top down approach to making your business loved by Google, paying attention to often overlooked principles such as sustainability and inimitability to ensure getting to the top means staying there.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">To watch Matthew in action <a href="http://www.figarodigital.co.uk/Video.aspx?v=6542937a-533a-4913-b891-56aefa735c2c" target="_blank">click here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gravytrain.co.uk/blog/2010/12/preparing-your-natural-search-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

